Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GAV 112 and GAV 112 MK I
#1
In comparison of my GAV 112 Plugin to the lately released GAV 112 MK I I have to say that there is a big difference in sound of both versions.
I compared it with my 62' Fender and the sound of the MK I is now a big step more closed ti the original.

Just the spring reverb emulation sounds a little too digital I think. Someone  either?
Producer & Mixing Engineer, Studio Owner Florida, USA
Reply

#2
(10-24-2025, 11:15 AM)MiamiSound Wrote: In comparison of my GAV 112 Plugin to the lately released GAV 112 MK I I have to say that there is a big difference in sound of both versions.
I compared it with my 62' Fender and the sound of the MK I is now a big step more closed ti the original.

Just the spring reverb emulation sounds a little too digital I think. Someone  either?

I'm pleased with the reverb, they made a good job to provide a spring reverb within a free amp sim plugin.

The sound of the MK 1 is really different, I like it much more now and the gain is more you ever need.

The Cakewalk issues are badly, shame on Bandlab.
Music Producer and Mixing Engineer  Cool
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.